Some people see Hydrogen as the solution for our energy and carbondioxide
problems. They believe or hope that hydrogen technology will allow us to
maintain present societal structures, consumption levels and mobility
patterns.
This is questionable, however, for a variety of reasons.
Fossil energy (oil, gas, coal) is used for manufacturing, heating and
transportation. Hereafter we will mainly discuss the proposal of using
hydrogen for transporation, since this appears to be the main thrust of
hydrogen research.
Basic figures (approximations) for hydrogen energy used for a
hydrogen fuell cell - electric car in comparison with petrol powered
piston engin car:
(1) Solar panels (Photo Voltaics) can generate electricity at 90 - 100
Watt per square meter. In other words, 10 square meter of solar panels
can produce 1 kWh of electricity in one hour.
(2) Producing 1 cubic meter Hydrogen gas costs 4 kilowatthour, by means
of electrolysis of water.
(3) Therefore the production of 1 m3 hydrogen gas requires 40
m2 of solar panels.
(4) One cubic meter of hydrogen gas at normal temperature is equivalent
to one litre of liquid hydrogen at minus 253.6 degrees centigrade: 1
m3 H2G = 1 L H2L.
(5) The energy contained in one litre of petrol is equivalent to 10 kWh
electricity (at 100 % conversion efficieny).
(6) Petrol consumption of a small passenger car: 7 L /100 km = 6.7 kg /
100 km
(7) Hydrogen: 1.8 kg H2L = 25 L H2L (density: 70
gram/L)
(8) The energy contained in 6.7 kg of petrol is equivalent to the energy
of 1.8 kg of liquid hydrogen, or 25 litre H2L, or enough for
100 km.
(9) At current market conditions one litre of liquid hydrogen
(H2L) costs SFr. 4.00 (US$ 2.70). At a consumption of 25 L
H2L / 100 km the fuel costs will be SFR.100.00 / 100 km.
Energy conversion efficiency rates to be considered:
(11) generated energy in the useful lifetime divided by the total
installed energy in the solar panels
(12) electrolysis process
(13) pressurising and cooling to obtain liquid hydrogen
(14) fuel cell - electric motor and piston engine efficiencies
etc.
A hydrogen economy - not subsidised by fossil fuels or atomic power -
must
be energetically self-sufficient. This means that all costs for
production,
distribution and conversion into work must be covered by the net
energetic
production. Costs include producing the equipment as well as energetic
conversion losses.
To our knowledge, energetic efficiency rates are, approximately:
[- converting solar energy into electricity by solar panels: 0.1]
- electrolysis of water: 0.3
- pressurising H2: 0.8
- liquifying H2 (minus 253.6 centigrades): 0.6
- transportation and storage: 0.9 (???)
- fuel cell: 0.4
- electric motor (e.g. as engine for a private car): 0.92
Multiplying these efficiencies (excluding the first one for the solar
cells) results in an overall energetic efficiency of 0.0477 or 4.77 per
cent.
Which would indicate that 95 per cent of the solar cell electricity
production dissappears as losses.
And this does not yet include the hydrogen needed to manufacture the
equipment cum infrastructure cum application for mobility or for
stationary
purposes.
If the above calculation is correct, it may be more efficient to use
solar
cells' electric power through different techniques/technologies and for
the
most important human undertakings (food, shelter, clothing, i.e. basic
human survival and happiness)?
Which car manufacturer has calculated the overall efficiency rate for
hydrogen as an energy carrier, incorporating all energy conversion rates
and energy investment in the means of hydrogen production, storage,
transportation and fuel cell - electric motor drive, in comparison with
conventional crude oil extraction, refining, storage, transportation and
petrol engine drive, for a small private car.
Thanks for your feedback and
advice